Moderators: Tuckerfan1053, TuckerCar, Phantomrig
TuckerCar wrote:The recent developments are compelling and will very likely result in some changes to the club's records of the whereabouts of 1018, 1027 and 1042.
tin goose wrote:Tucker:
do you have any side pics of the front clip from 1018? damage examination was posted comparing the 'vert to 1027, and since the front fenders are supposedly from 1018 I would like to see what they look like...??
Tucker Fan 48 wrote:Cole may have a transmission that could have been used in a Tucker but stating it has the correct transmission as proof it is a factory built Tucker is misleading.
Justin Cole wrote: We did our homework and and we looked the car over. And uh, uh, I mean it's got the authentic Tucker um, uh, flat 6 that they used in all the Tuckers and the correct transmission and, uh, pretty much all the components were there, uh. We had to do some fabricating, uh, for the quarter panels, back behind the doors, and uh, um, the rocker panels we had to do...
Brian Earnest wrote:Reinert said when he acquired the car it was basically a frame with a cowl tack-welded in place, two front doors and two rear quarter panels. “It had no motor, no transmission, no steering, no tires or wheels. No nothing. After I found the car I started scrounging parts.”
Return to Tucker Fact or Fiction
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest